Eternal Feast

A factual, rational, emotional, and spiritual approach to Christianity for a skeptical generation. We value respect, acceptance, and humility. We have faith, hope, and love. Welcome.

Do you believe in human rights? Then you believe in God.

Do you believe in objective morality?  That is, do you believe that certain things are inherently right or wrong, good or evil?  Or do you believe that everything is relative, and that each person can decide what is right or wrong for herself?  I am going to show you that you already know that morality is objective, that objective morality can only exist if God exists, and therefore that you know deep in your heart that God exists.  “Okay,” you say.  “Try me.”  Okay, let’s go.

Read More

Who is Jesus Christ, Part 3: Options 2-5, Moral teacher, Liar, Lunatic, or Lord

In this series, we are examining the figure of Jesus Christ, the claims that he made, the tests that a worldview must pass (intellectually credible and existentially satisfying), and the intellectual challenge posed by the figure of Christ.  We are also exploring the possible conclusions one could draw based on the facts.  As a believer, I will show you why I believe the evidence inescapably points in one direction. 

The facts

Here is the data we have.  Given these five facts, we must arrive at a conclusion that adequately explains them if we are to live our lives with any intellectual integrity.

1. There was a man who walked this earth 2,000 years ago who claimed to be the Messiah, the Son of God, come to earth from heaven.  He claimed to be bringing the kingdom of God to the world.

2. As this man went about with his message, the people who heard him speak saw him do things that appeared to be miracles.  They saw him feed 5,000 people from what looked like a few loaves of bread and a few fish, they saw him walk on water, they saw him raise people from the dead, and they saw him heal people who were sick.  We won’t even make the jump and say he performed actual miracles yet, but it is a fact that people saw him perform what they believed to be miracles.  It created an incredible sensation in first century Israel and was the center of much controversy. 

3. This man not only claimed to be God, but he was able to convince the people who were closest to him, the people who lived with him, that he actually was God.  Keep in mind that the last people on earth who would believe that a human being could be God were first century Jews.  It wouldn’t be that unusual for eastern religions to believe in God in human form since they believed God was a life force that was in everyone and everything.  Romans and Greeks believed their gods could take the form of human beings, and even have children with human beings.  Jews, on the other hand, believed God transcended the world and that nothing created, nothing of this world, should ever be worshipped.  It was in the first commandment.

4. After this man died, hundreds of people attested to the fact that they saw him risen from the dead.  These weren’t just one-on-one encounters, but dozens and hundreds of people claimed to have seen him at one time.

5. This experience transformed people’s lives so much that they went out and died for the belief that this man rose from the dead and was the Son of God.

How do you account for the facts?  There are five options.  The last post addressed the option that Jesus was a legend.  Today, we will address the remaining options.

Read More

Who is Jesus Christ, Part 2: The data and option 1, Jesus was a legend

In the previous post, we examined the figure of Jesus Christ, the claims that he made, the tests that a worldview must pass (intellectually credible and existentially satisfying), and the intellectual challenge posed by the figure of Christ.  In the next few posts, we will explore the possible conclusions one could draw based on the facts.  As a believer, I will show you why I believe the evidence inescapably points in one direction. 

The facts 

Here is the data we have.  Given these five facts, we must arrive at a conclusion that adequately explains them if we are to live our lives with any intellectual integrity. 

1. There was a man who walked this earth 2,000 years ago who claimed to be the Messiah, the Son of God, come to earth from heaven.  He claimed to be bringing the kingdom of God to the world.

2. As this man went about with his message, the people who heard him speak saw him do things that appeared to be miracles.  They saw him feed 5,000 people from what looked like a few loaves of bread and a few fish, they saw him walk on water, they saw him raise people from the dead, and they saw him heal people who were sick.  We won’t even make the jump and say he performed actual miracles yet, but it is a fact that people saw him perform what they believed to be miracles.  It created an incredible sensation in first century Israel and was the center of much controversy. 

3. This man not only claimed to be God, but he was able to convince the people who were closest to him, the people who lived with him, that he actually was God.  Keep in mind that the last people on earth who would believe that a human being could be God were first century Jews.  It wouldn’t be that unusual for eastern religions to believe in God in human form since they believed God was a life force that was in everyone and everything.  Romans and Greeks believed their gods could take the form of human beings, and even have children with human beings.  Jews, on the other hand, believed God transcended the world and that nothing created, nothing of this world, should ever be worshipped.  It was in the first commandment. 

4. After this man died, hundreds of people attested to the fact that they saw him risen from the dead.  These weren’t just one-on-one encounters, but dozens and hundreds of people claimed to have seen him at one time. 

5. This experience transformed people’s lives so much that they went out and died for the belief that this man rose from the dead and was the Son of God.

How do you account for the facts?  There are five options, and over the next several posts, I will address each option. 

Read More

Who is Jesus Christ, Part 1: Christianity, truth, and the spiritual placebo effect

The figure of Jesus Christ, throughout history, has continually ignited debate.  All intelligent people will be part of that debate.  In this post and the next, through the lens of this debate, we will explore worldviews and the truth of Christianity.  

These are the two tests for any worldview: it has to be intellectually credible and existentially satisfying.  That is, it has to be rational, logical, and true, and it has to be relevant, meet our needs, and connect with our experiences.  In secular culture, we don’t ask the first question.  All we ask today is, “Does this meet my needs?”  I understand why we might see things this way, but this is a dangerous path to walk down. 

Read More

Email Q&A: Secularism, New-Age Spirituality vs. Christianity, Atrocities committed in the name of Christ - 03/03/12

I received the following questions in an email.  Below are my responses!  Note that my responses are slightly modified from what I typed in the actual email.  

First of all, can you speak more about the lines you are drawing between “secular” and “religious/sacred” worlds?  Do you think the two can or do coexist ever?

How do you feel about people who claim to be “spiritual but not religious?”  Do you think it is possible that the language of the bible simply does not register with the fast paced, postmodern way of knowing the world?

Can you talk more about the “other-worldly” aspects of your faith?  How do you see this other-world (Kingdom of God, you might say) breaking in/acting in/not interested in this world?  

Most importantly, how does your faith ask you to act in this world? And what about others? 

What do you think about colonialist appropriations of Christianity to keep entire populations subjugated and complacent so that white western societies could exploit and dominate their land, resources and souls?

Read More

Christianity and being gay

Update 03/11/12

A gay friend recently told me she was hurt by the tone of this post.  I would just like to clarify the following: As Christians, we are called to live in radical acceptance of our gay brothers and sisters as children of God.  Radical acceptance does not necessarily mean agreement, but it does mean an attitude of understanding and love.  Disagreement does not mean judgment.  Judgment and harsh words have absolutely no place in a Christian’s reaction to his or her neighbor — Muslim, Buddhist, black, white, gay, or straight.

If I were gay, the questions I would be asking myself are:

1. Is it true that Christ rose from the dead, and

2. If this is true, what are the implications of this for my life?  

I would want to take into account my very large bias not to believe it’s true (homosexuals and heterosexuals have this in common).  Maybe people’s interpretation of what the Bible says about homosexuality is wrong.  Maybe not.  Let’s be concerned with the Truth above all else.  

Regardless, if you are gay, know that God came to earth through Jesus Christ to give you eternal life and the right to be a child of God if you believe in Him, despite what anyone else has to say about it.  When I accepted Christ, I only wanted a few things to change, but He changed everything in my life.  If you are gay and you accept Christ, neither of us knows what will happen.  That’s part of the adventure.  

Read More

Does your life really matter?

There is one question that all great thinkers asked themselves, and urged us to ask ourselves as well.  If you want to live with intellectual integrity and consistency, you must ask it of yourself.  Tolstoy, Voltaire, Dostoevsky, Shakespeare, Huxley, Jesus Christ.  The mark of these truly great thinkers, among many others, is that they urge us to stop what we are doing, step back, and ask, “What am I really living for?  Why do I do anything that I do?”

This is not a small matter.  In fact, it is the whole matter.  If you want to make any sense of this life at all, you cannot hide from this question in laziness and cowardice.  If you do not have an answer to this question, and do not take time to answer it, you are living the illusion of a meaningful life, where there really is no meaning at all.  Ignoring it, at best, will lead to an eventual life crisis when you realize everything you thought you cared about, you actually don’t care about at all.  At worst, ignoring it will lead to living an entire life devoid of any meaning whatsoever. 

Read More